Robocop (2014): The PG-13 Robocop Remake No One Wanted

An ultimately harmless and forgettable remake to the great Robocop original.

Ultimate action movie enthusiasts around the world likely let out a collective groan when announcements of a Robocop remake sprung up all over the internet. And why shouldn’t they have? The original movie was a classic. So what if it’s dated to the 1980s—good storytelling has no expiration date and many of the problems Paul Verhoeven satirizes are still relevant in our time.

But Hollywood had its way and we got a Robocop remake. A PG-13 Robocop remake. Apparently, no one learned anything from Robocop 3, which saddled Robocop with largely bloodless fight scenes (both literally and figuratively)—though thank heaven, we aren’t saddled with an annoying kid protagonist or an entirely incompetent Robocop.

Before we dive in, take a moment to read our UAMC reviews of the original Robocops.

A Fourth Robocop Film

In 2028, international conglomerate OmniCorp creates peacekeeping robots to send overseas. They want to implement their technology within the US, but controversy over the lack of a human element in these machines (which resulted in accidental deaths in the Middle East) has led to a polarized response from Americans.

Meanwhile, Detroit cop Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman) gets critically injured when a bomb is planted in his car by a local drug-lord’s lackeys. Able to convince his distraught wife (Abbie Cornish) to give them permission to operate on him, OmniCorp turns him into Robocop. Now they have their mechanical peacekeeper and a “human element,” though a chip in Robocop’s hardwiring keeps his free will under the control of the company, unbeknownst to the general public or Murphy himself.

And then… the film kind of meanders. A lot of attention is given to the cybernetics of the Robocop suit, the question of how much free will he does or does not have, how the bypass of his empathy affects his relationship with his family—though none of these things are ever explored in as much depth as they warrant. There is no hunt for vengeance or much of a quest element at all.

All of the Robocop Movies Ranked From Best to Worst

Why Too Serious?

At any rate, it definitely would not fit UAMC standards as an action movie. It’s a movie that almost seems embarrassed to bear the name “Robocop,” so seriously does it take itself, very much in The Dark Knight mode with its aesthetics and the way it handles action scenes.

Many times, the movie seems to be going for something more realistic in tone—until it suddenly doesn’t, for this is an action film with an identity crisis. Does the new Robocop want to be an over-the-top experience like the original or does it wish to cleave to a grittier approach? The film never settles on one or the other, making it a tonal mess at times.

Take the first time we see Robocop in action, shooting down robotic adversaries in a demonstration of his abilities, rock music blaring, informing us that yes, this is fun and awesome in the vein of an Iron Man movie. The problem? These scenes almost trick you into thinking the movie is capturing the irreverent humor of the original, but then later on, we get scenes ripped straight out of modern war movies or police thrillers, scenes as far from the tone of “awesome movie action” as you can get. Once again, there is nothing wrong with a grittier tone—but the filmmakers should have picked one or the other.

5 Things to Know About the Latest Robocop Reboot

The Bloodless Robocop

Robocop ’14 also has to be one of the most bloodless remakes of all time—and I’m not just talking the PG-13 rating… though that’s a problem too. Everything seems so stock and rote. The antagonists aren’t interesting, even with fine actors like Michael Keaton and Gary Oldman in the roles.

Keaton’s OmniCorp CEO in particular is a disappointment as a Big Bad: he has no personal beef with Murphy but nor does he have much reason to turn against him, which, predictably, he and OmniCorp indeed do. In fact, the villains don’t have too much of a reason to hate Robocop, as he never goes so boldly against his directives as he did in the original. When they go after him and his family, it just feels like a way of giving the movie a decent climactic confrontation and not as a natural culmination of conflict.

Matters aren’t helped with the wife and son lacking distinctive personalities, despite having a good chunk of screen-time. The same could be said of the wife and kid in the original Robocop, true, but they were present only peripherally and served as a reminder of what Murphy had lost in becoming a cyborg. They were more symbols than characters, which is clearly not the intention in the reimagining.

Alex Murphy is far less likable in both guises. Murphy is less the warm family man and more a scowling smartass who doesn’t even seem to have much warmth towards his family even in his brief pre-accident interactions with them. He retains his memories, making the loss of his humanity less affecting. He doesn’t undergo an alteration of personality when he becomes Robocop either. The sum total of these elements means that the transition from man to mechanical product leaves less of an impact.

COPYCATS! Robocop (1987) vs. Robo Vampire (1988)

When Robocop Became Harmless

Overall, it feels less inspired too. Robocop ‘87 took from westerns, science fiction, and the Bible, creating a unique vibe that elevated it above standard revenge-action schlock. Robocop ‘14 takes from contemporary political thrillers and The Dark Knight—not nearly as rich a reservoir. As a result, it feels more derivative and generic.

I know a common rule in reviewing remakes is to forget the original exists and to evaluate the new movie on its own merits, but my problem with this remake is that it doesn’t do much to distinguish itself. It’s not interesting enough to make me forget the unforgettable original. Compare this to other remakes, like John Carpenter’s The Thing, which is successful because it picks a different direction from the 1950s original and then sticks with it. No tonal flip-flopping.

Whatever. The remake is harmless. Forgettable, but harmless. We’ll always have Verhoeven.


What are your thoughts on the Robocop Remake (2014)? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

Sylvester Stallone’s Top 5 Movies About Arm Wrestling Truck Drivers

The most ‘OVER THE TOP’ arm wrestling truck driver action movies by Sylvester Stallone!

Over the Top
Sylvester Stallone in Over the Top (1987).

The great Sylvester Stallone has a pretty ultimate action movie career. However, if there is any action movie sub-genre in which Sly really shines, it’s the father-son truck-driving arm-wrestling tournament epic. If you’d like to see our REGULAR list of the best Sylvester Stallone action movies – then this is the article for you.

BUT, if you’re here to see our list of the most ultimate arm wrestling truck driving action movies by Sylvester Stallone, then check out our Top 5 selections below.

Rambo 5: Last Blood: Everything About Stallone’s Final Rambo Performance

5) Over the Top (1987)

While not his quite his greatest arm wrestling truck driver movie, Over the Top (1987) is really a Sylvester Stallone classic. This movie has it all. Truck driving. Arm wrestling. A whiny kid. A rich grandfather. A dying mother who looks like David Bowie. You name it. Over the Top has it!

4) Over the Top (1987)

Another solid Sylvester Stallone arm wrestling truck driving action movie, Over the Top (1987) is a great example of just how versatile of an actor Stallone really is.

In this Cannon Films classic, Stallone shines as Lincoln Hawk, a blue collared truck driving American who just wants what we all want – our son back.

And how do you get him back? Well you bootstrap yourself up and kidnap him for a rough and tumble cross country road adventure where you can make up for lost time and be the ultimate father in which you’re truly meant to be!

The 10 Best Sylvester Stallone Ultimate Action Movies!

3) Over the Top (1987)

In a somewhat surprise selection here at number 3, Over the Top (1987) is an underappreciated Sylvester Stallone truck driving arm wrestling vehicle that really hits on all cylinders. Not only does Over the Top have some great car chases and fight scenes, it also has the most balls-to-the-wall arm wrestling tournaments put to film.

2) Over the Top (1987)

Now to the real good stuff, released in 1987 by Cannon Films, Over the Top was actually directed by Menahem Golan himself!

Sylvester Stallone captivated audiences in the story of a long-haul truck driver who tries to win back his alienated son while becoming a champion arm wrestler.

It truly is some of Stallone’s most heartfelt work and vastly overshadows his Rocky and Rambo efforts in terms of its truck driving and arm wrestling scenes.

How Sylvester Stallone Shaped the History of Action Movies with Rocky (1976)

1) Over the Top (1987)

That’s right. You read us right! Our number 1 most ultimate truck driving arm wrestling Sylvester Stallone action movie is none other than – OVER THE TOP (1987)!

Where to begin… Cinema itself has never known a movie to pack more badass ultimateness into one picture.

From the scenic opening montage of Sylvester Stallone driving his truck up a mountain to the awe-inspiring ending where Stallone gets back his son (and his NEW TRUCK) by winning the most ferocious arm wrestling tournament ever, OVER THE TOP is the Citizen Kane of Sylvester Stallone arm wrestling truck driving action movies! Period.


What’s your pick for the most ultimate arm wrestling truck driver Sylvester Stallone action movie? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

Robocop 3: Not the Worst Sci-Fi Action Movie Ever

Robocop 3’s Failed Attempt to Live Up to Its Sci-Fi Action Legacy

Robocop 3 is a movie that largely inspires dread and loathing from the very mention of it. I would love to say this reaction is undeserved, that Robocop 3 is a misunderstood classic.

It’s not. It’s an undignified end to the original Robocop saga that will give you a major case of secondhand embarrassment for all involved.

However, I do want to be fair, so I’ll acknowledge two things that are often considered “bad” in this movie that really aren’t terrible.

Before we dive in, take a moment to read our UAMC reviews of Robocop 1 and Robocop 2 first:

Robert John Burke Takes His Turn

One, Robert John Burke playing Robocop. No, he isn’t Peter Weller. Yes, Weller owns this role. However, Burke does as good as anyone else could with this sewage plant of a screenplay.

Two, Otomo. The idea of Robocop fighting what is basically a samurai Terminator is silly, sure, but with the right execution could have been fun in a ridiculously awesome way—you know, kind of like a movie about a robot cop is awesome with the right execution. But what they did in Robocop 3 was not the right context. It might be ridiculous, but it isn’t awesome.

Why? Let me count the ways, starting with the “plot.”

All of the Robocop Movies Ranked From Best to Worst

Robocop Returns… Again!

Omni Consumer Products has been bought out by Kanemitsu, which is basically the Japanese OCP. Intent on getting their plans for the utopic Delta City underway, OCP has plans to demolish the slummy part of Detroit, much to the consternation of the inhabitants. Armed forces known as the Urban Rehabilitators, led by the ruthless John McDaggett (John Castle), seek to clear out or kill any homeless they encounter to speed up the process.

Nikko (Remy Ryan), a child prodigy with computers, is a victim of the Urban Rehabilitators. Losing her parents to their brutality, she finds shelter with a group of homeless who have banded together to form a resistance movement, living in the sewers and bombing OCP property.

Then Robocop (Robert John Burke) gets drawn into the battle when all four of his directives come into conflict. (Even though his directives were allegedly erased completely in Robocop 2, but Robocop 3 laughs at continuity.)

COPYCATS! Robocop (1987) vs. Robo Vampire (1988)

Robocop 3: An Ultimate Mess

Robocop 3 cannot be said to have a plot so much as a series of underdeveloped threads which lead to nothing. Robocop’s character development was pretty much over after the first movie, though the second film at least attempted some further exploration of his personality. Robocop 3 doesn’t care. Though technically the film has a ticking clock element, the suspense is nil. Characters are content to stand around, talk, and pick their noses while mayhem reigns.

The first Robocop had two of the greatest villains in modern action cinema. Robocop 2 had a villain with potential who was underused, but nevertheless got a cool final battle. Robocop 3 cannot be bothered to give us even a central villain, throwing out mostly unmemorable baddies.

Rip Torn is the new OCP president. He makes no impression beyond A) he’s greedy and B) he resents being bought out by a Japanese company. I don’t think he has more than twenty minutes of screen-time and even that might be generous. His shouting is entertaining though.

Bruce Locke is Otomo, the Kanemitsu robot assassin. He’s pretty cool with his collected demeanor, sunglasses, and swordplay. He could have made an interesting nemesis with more screen-time. And character development. And a decent confrontation with Robocop (we’ll get to THAT mess later).

Mako is the Kanemitsu president. He has even less screen-time than Torn and that makes me most sad. How do you have Mako in a movie and just not use him?!

The most prominent of the villains is McDaggett (John Castle). Unfortunately, he is the least interesting, just your run-of-the-mill “mwahaha I’m the English bad guy.”

5 Things to Know About the Latest Robocop Reboot

Badass License Revoked

While some accuse Robocop 2 of trying to appeal to children with the nasty Hob character and looting little league team, I still say that film’s use of kid characters was meant to highlight how innocence is inevitably warped within a violent culture.

Here, the little kid Nikko is definitely there as an audience avatar for the youngsters. She’s cutesy in a way that just feels wrong for the setting. She’s also rather useless despite being a super genius who can reprogram an ED-209 to be as loyal as a puppy… by literally typing “loyal as a puppy” as a command into its system.

ED-209 isn’t the only character who got its badass license revoked either. Robocop himself is suddenly a much clumsier fighter. The punishment he takes from enemies is cringeworthy to watch, not because you feel scared for the character, but because you don’t buy that he’d so easily be taken down by these villains. In the first Robocop, it took the whole Detroit police force or heavy machinery to bring Robocop to his knees. Now it feels like a feather could kill him.

The Most Villainous Bad Guys in Ultimate Action Movie History

Robocop 3’s Unrealized Action Potential

Take the battle between Otomo and Robocop. This should have been AWESOME. Instead, Robocop literally stands there and lets this guy pummel him. It’s one thing to be taken by surprise—but this happens TWICE IN A ROW. And then Robocop just lets Otomo chop him up, sitting there stupefied like this is a slapstick comedy routine. And then he lets himself get knocked over again before finally just shooting the guy. It’s a fight both boring and embarrassing—a microcosm of the whole movie, really.

I didn’t even get into everything wrong with Robocop 3, like the pathetic killing-off of Officer Lewis or the terrible supporting performances. At the very least, Basil Poledouris is back to score the movie, resurrecting the themes from the original film. Unfortunately, it only makes the contrast between the epic music and subpar content all the greater.

But it all gets down to one thing: nobody wants a kid-friendly Robocop. The appeal of Robocop is that delicious blend of biting satire and over-the-top action. By trying to appeal to everyone, Robocop 3 appeals to just about no one.

Luckily, Hollywood never EVER made the mistake of producing a PG-13 Robocop ever again.

…Right?


What are your thoughts on Robocop 3? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

UAMC Review: The Ultimately Awesome ‘Commando Ninja’ (2018)

There Can Be Only One Commando Ninja!

As an action movie lover (I prefer the term aficionado), Commando Ninja is a project near and dear to my heart. I had heard of it earlier this year, and when I saw its trailer for the first time on Kickstarter, I knew immediately I had to fund it. With this 65-minute movie, Ben Combes successfully combined elements of popular 1980s Hollywood action movies and created what I feel is an independent cinematic masterpiece.

“Fifty percent commando. Fifty percent ninja. One hundred percent American!”

With those words, spoken in the vein of the late Don LaFontaine, the trailer instantly lets viewers know what they’re in for: action, action, and more action! And thus, we here at The Ultimate Action Movie Club loved it!

Bonus: here is our UAMC interview with creator Ben Combes!

The ULTIMATE Commando Ninja

Because it’s a new release (available now on YouTube – check the end of the article!), I don’t want to include too many spoilers. I can tell you that Commando Ninja has obvious (but well-done) homages to the following 1980s-era action heavyweights: Commando; American Ninja; Predator; Rambo: First Blood Part II; Kickboxer, Bloodsport, Terminator and Kung Fury. That’s a lot of testosterone!

It’s not hard to figure where those influences fall into place when you read its plot: John Hunter, a Vietnam veteran living alone in Canada, is informed by his former commanding officer that his ex-wife was murdered and his daughter kidnapped. Caring not so much about the former (but infinitely more about the latter), John must unleash Hell on Earth to rescue his daughter and right the wrongs — the only way he knows how!

Eric Carlesi absolutely knocks it out of the park in his portrayal of John Hunter. With a shooting schedule that started and stopped according to how much funding backers donated, I know he worked incredibly hard in the gym to get a chiseled physique and achieve the Rambo/Matrix/Dutch look. 

Everything Action Fans Could Want

Commando Ninja includes everything fans of the action genre from the 1980s love: an invincible protagonist; scores upon scores of massacred nameless/faceless antagonists; pithy one-liners; an incredibly well-done synth soundtrack; time travel; and more!

Combes carefully picked and chose which elements fans would instantly recognize and appreciate. There’s a reason guys (and some gals) our age re-watch classic action movies from our youth that we hold near and dear our heart. It has nothing to do with knowing what will happen, but rather the sum of the parts. It’s these parts that if separated from the movie are great by themselves; when they’re merged as parts of the movie, they combine to make it fantastic!

In addition, whereas Kung Fury was a one-hit wonder, Combes has chosen to continue the Commando Ninja brand in multiple formats: a DVD/Blu-Ray; a comic book; toys; t-shirts; and posters. I work in marketing and have to tip my hat to him: he knows how to brand a product!

I would remiss to exclude that the movie was filmed by foreign speakers and English dialogue was dubbed post-production. Rest assured, it did absolutely nothing to take away from what I feel is easily one of 2018’s best action flicks. On the contrary, I think it’s all part of the movie’s charm.

Check it Out Yourself

Commando Ninja is beyond fantastic, and it’s not a modern update to the genre — but that’s a very good thing. It’s something that could just as easily fit in among the aforementioned movies on a neighborhood video store shelf in suburban America during the Reagan administration. That’s the highest praise I can give it. It was written, produced and made by an 80s action movie fan for action movie fans. If you’re reading this review, I strongly suspect that’s you!

So log on to YouTube and check it out for yourself. You won’t be disappointed.


Did you see Commando Ninja in its entirety yet? Let us know your thoughts in the comments or on our Facebook page!

COPYCATS! Batman (1989) vs. Black Scorpion (1995)

Tim Burton’s Batman (1989) takes on its ultimate COPYCAT Black Scorpion (1995)!

We have ourselves another ultimate showdown between Tim Burton’s Batman (1989) and the B-movie rip-off Black Scorpion (1995) in this edition of COPYCATS! (Check out past episodes on Lethal Weapon vs LA ViceThe Fugitive vs. Fugitive X, and RoboCop vs. RoboVampire)

Copycats is a bimonthly column about popular action movies and the low-budget films they inspire. Each column, we take a popular action movie and find its cinematic doppelganger, revel in their similarities and dissect their differences. Some of these copycats are good enough (or strange enough) to earn their place in action movie history, but most are being chronicled here to preserve their existence – for better or for worse.

Batman (1989) vs. Black Scorpion (1995)

Original Film: Batman, 1989, starring Michael Keaton and Jack Nicholson, directed by Tim Burton

Copycat: Black Scorpion, 1995, starring Joan Severance and Garrett Morris, directed by Jonathan Winfrey

Synopsis of both films: In a crime-ridden major metropolitan city, only one masked hero – with a really cool car – can keep the city safe from a criminal mastermind.

Copycat Comparison:

Until 1989, most non-comic-book-reading people knew batman as the Caped Crusader portrayed on the cheesy 1960s serial starring Adam West and Burt Ward or as a member of the animated Super Friends. Director Tim Burton, fresh off directing Beetlejuice (1988) and Pee-wee’s Big Adventure (1985), was given the task of bringing Batman to the big screen. His version (which made the fanboys and fangirls go nuts) was much darker, much more action driven, and completely devoid of the cartoony cheesiness common viewers had come to expect from Batman and his Boy Wonder.

With a budget of $35 million (which seems crazy by today’s standards) Burton’s Batman was a huge hit – grossing $411 million worldwide and spawning a number of sequels and imitators. One such copycat was Black Scorpion

Produced by B-Movie Behemoth Roger Corman – who is credited for coming up with the idea after saying to writer Craig Nevius that he “wanted to do a female Superman-Spiderman-Batman” – Black Scorpion premiered as part of his Roger Corman Presents series on Showtime. You see, kids, back in the day, movie channels didn’t spend hundreds of millions on creating original content, they spent a large portion of their meager budgets on the broadcast rights of movie blockbusters – which they premiered during primetime – and the rest was used to either purchase or produce low-budget fare to fill the rest of the schedule. And, if you’re reading this column, you were probably up at about 3 a.m. religiously watching these “filler” movies.

Back to Black Scorpion. Starring former model Joan Severance [No Holds Barred (1988) and Bird on the Wire (1990)], Black Scorpion does share some similarities to Batman – albeit low-rent homages to the blockbuster – including:

  • Both Batman and Black Scorpion are alter egos of prominent citizens (Bruce Wayne, a millionaire philanthropist, and Darcy Walker, a cop)
  • Both have a backstory that involves the death of a parent
  • Both have no actual super powers, but have access to super-powered technology
  • Both have really cool cars, black costumes and identifying accessories (Batman has the utility belt while Black Scorpion has a taser ring)
  • Both face off against villains with man-made deformities (Batman had the Joker, a maniacal clown, and Black Scorpion had Breathtaker, an asthmatic baddie trying to steal the air – which, as I write it, sounds like something The Simpsons’ Mr. Burns would do). 
  • Both have a tech guy (Batman has Alfred and, of course, a ton of money, while Black Scorpion has a former car thief/car-pimper-upper Argyle (the always funny Garrett Morris)
  • Both kind of reveal themselves to a love interest – Batman to Vicki Vale (Kim Basinger) and Black Scorpion to her police partner Michael Russo (Bruce Abbott). Side note, Black Scorpion reveals her secret identity during sex, so Russo is really the winner in this faceoff.

Remember when Corman said he “wanted to do a female Superman-Spiderman-Batman?” Well, he did, pretty much exactly. The difference being he probably did it for one thirty-fifth of Batman’s budget, or less.

Also, like Batman, Black Scorpion was followed by a sequel, Black Scorpion II: Aftershock (1996), and a reboot/tv series, Black Scorpion (2001, with Michelle Lintel in the lead).

Which is better?

Black Scorpion. SURPRISE! You see, I’ve always found Burton’s Batman to be kind of boring. Like everyone else in 1989, I saw it in the movie theatre, and it was fine. But during a summer that also had the release of the third Indiana Jones, the second Ghostbusters and Lethal Weapon, Road House, The Abyss and two other underwater movies, Kickboxer, UHF and Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Batman was literally the dark horse.

It looked great back in 1989, but it was also dim and moody. In my humble opinion, Batman Returns (1992), is a much more enjoyable movie (primarily because it looks like Burton allowed himself to have a little fun), and Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy captured Batman’s character better – keeping the mood dark without dimming the lights.

Black Scorpion is a Roger Corman movie. It’s not trying to be anything other than a knockoff, and there’s satisfaction in that. It’s an easy watch, especially Joan Severance … I know, probably not supposed to say that anymore, but Severance is a beautiful woman who kicks butt wearing a tight black outfit with thigh-high boots, so, cut me some slack! Its low-rent imitations of big-budget Batman adds to the enjoyment, as does Garrett Morris. It’s a fun movie, and it’s better than Batman. There, I said it, and I don’t care what you think!


Article by Eric LaRose – a Wisconsin-based connoisseur of action, horror and sci-fi movies from the ‘80s and ‘90s. A former journalist and podcaster, Eric wrote the ending to the Toxic Avenger Part 4, but the only person who will back up that claim is his wife.

What are your thoughts on this Batman v Black Scorpion showdown? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

An Official ‘Die Hard The Greatest Christmas Story’ Trailer is Here to End Any Debate

Die Hard is a Christmas Movie. Full Stop!

The decades old debate over whether Die Hard can be classed as a Christmas film may have finally been settled. Everyone knows the story of Die HardBruce Willis plays John McClane, an off-duty cop, forced to come to the rescue of his wife and several others taken hostage by German terrorists during a Christmas party at the Nakatomi Plaza in Los Angeles.

For years, the debate has raged as to whether the fact the events of the film unfold on Christmas Eve qualifies it as a festive classic.

Writer Steven E De Souza has always insisted it is a Christmas movie. Willis, meanwhile, recently came out to insist the exact opposite. Now Twentieth Century Fox, the studio behind the film, have weighed into the debate with what many are calling the definitive answer.

Bonus, in case you missed it, Bruce Willis is confirmed to return for a 6th Die Hard – a prequel titled McClane! Plus more Die Hard news for ya!

A Die Hard Christmas Story

To celebrate the 30th anniversary of the film’s release, they’ve put together a special festive Die Hard trailer in which the movie is described as “the greatest Christmas story ever told”.

It could be the absolute proof of what many have always suspected: Die Hard is the greatest Christmas movie of all time. In the clip, John McClane is described as a man “who just wants to spend Christmas with his family.”

Later in the trailer, a voiceover states: “This Christmas get ready to jingle some bells and deck the halls with bows of…”, shortly before cutting to a clip of McClane calling the wife by her first name “Holly.”

To top things off, the film’s titles appear later on decked out in Christmas light. Coming off like the spiritual step-brother of Home Alone with a machine gun, this is every die-hard Die Hard fan’s fantasy. Definitive proof if ever it were needed, right?

However, if you need more proof (or a good counter argument, you can always check out one of these articles.


What do you think of this new re-cut Christmas Die Hard trailer? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

10 Reasons Why ‘Rocky IV’ is the Most Underrated Christmas Movie of All-Time

Move over Die Hard, Sylvester Stallone’s ‘Rocky IV’ is the true ultimate action Christmas movie!

Die Hard’s status as a Christmas film is a source of much debate among action movie fans. Some see it as a Christmas film, complete with moral message. Others reckon the film’s Christmas Eve setting is simply a happy accident.

And while the Ultimate Action Movie Club tends to fall into the former category (here are 5 reasons – and 51 examples – of why Die Hard IS a Christmas film), we can’t help but think another film is being overlooked. (In fact, here is another list of our Top Action Movies to watch during the holidays too!)

Forget fellow festive outsiders like Lethal Weapon for a second; when it comes to picking out the most underrated Christmas movie of all-time, it has to be Rocky IV. And here are 10 reasons why!

Die Hard Christmas Movie T-Shirts

10) That ‘Festive’ Setting

Let’s start with the most obvious way in which Rocky IV is a Christmas film – the fact that Sylvester Stallone’s Rocky Balboa ends up fighting Dolph Lundgren’s Ivan Drago in deepest, darkest, snowbound Russia on December 25.

The snowy backdrop of Krasnogourbinsk might be a bleak, depressing example of Soviet Russia, but it’s got an unmistakably festive feel, like Charles DickensLondon in A Christmas Carol. God bless us, everyone.

Also, be sure to check out our UAMC reviews of the original Rocky movies below!

9) The Gift of Freedom

Forever remembered as the Cold War Rocky movie, Rocky IV sees the American Balboa going toe-to-toe with the Soviet state-trained Drago in 15 rounds of crazy and, entirely unrealistic, boxing mayhem.

Rocky comes out the victor, triumphing in Drago’s backyard and sending a message to the Soviet people that they too can rise up and fight back against the oppressive Russian regime. In doing so, he’s giving them the greatest Christmas gift of all: freedom. Is it any coincidence that the Soviet Union began to fall apart in the years after Rocky IV was released? Yes, yes, it is.

Dolph Lundgren Reveals What Ivan Drago Has Been up to Since Rocky IV

8) Crap Presents

Think back on Christmases past and chances are you’ll remember a particular gift that hasn’t necessarily aged all that well. For you and I that might be something like a Sony MiniDisc player or Sega Dreamcast, for the Balboa family it’s undoubtedly Sico, the rubbish robot butler they bought for Paulie.

It’s a limited, lumbering bit of technology, ill-equipped for the challenges of its role. Paulie doesn’t even want Sico declaring “I wanted a sports car, not no walking trash can!” Crap presents and ungrateful recipients? It’s like every Christmas you’ve ever had in your life.

7) The Fights

If there’s one thing any family knows about Christmas is that fights will be had. You’ll fight about presents, board games and what to watch on TV. The fights presented in Rocky IV are symbolic of the battles we all face at Christmas, often with loved ones offering contrasting ideas.

No punches are thrown in family fights, of course, but by watching these grown men beat the living hell out of each other most families probably realise their own petty arguments are nothing by comparison and should be set aside.

Video: How Sylvester Stallone and Carl Weathers Choreographed That Epic Rocky Fight

6) Poor Little Paulie

Rocky’s lumbering brother-in-law and friend isn’t the brightest bulb in the box and not always that helpful to have around. But he’s family and family mean something. Especially at Christmas.

“I know sometimes I act stupid and I say stupid things, but you kept me around and other people would have said “drop that bum”. You give me respect,” he tells Rocky. He’s basically Rocky’s very Tiny Tim. Albeit Tiny Tim with a drinking problem.

5) Finding Out Who’s Naughty and Nice

If Stallone’s Balboa serves as the film’s stand-in Santa Claus, then Drago is undoubtedly the naughty boy of the movie, who needs to be punished for his misdemeanors.

Misdemeanors like taking performance enhancing drugs and killing Apollo Creed. He doesn’t even care either, declaring: “If he dies, he dies.” This guy is getting a lump of coal in his stocking for sure.

4) That Training Montage

Rocky’s intense training montage takes place inside the confines of the kind of snowy log-cabin. It’s supposed to be in Russia, but it could easily be Lapland, with Rocky and his pals renting the cottage from its usual owner, Santa Claus, who is letting the place out while he’s away on business.

Okay it’s a stretch, but on a purely symbolic level the effort Rocky goes to, to prepare for his big day on December 25 is akin to the effort that goes into preparing for most Christmases.

Dolph Lundgren Came Dangerously Close to Turning Down Creed 2

3) Being Together as A Family

One of the most festive moments of the film comes when Rocky’s wife, Adrian, reunites with her husband to give him one final surge of encouragement ahead of his big fight with Drago.

Then, when the fight is over, a visibly shaken and potentially brain-damaged Rocky still finds the strength to wish his son a merry Christmas on top of solving that whole pesky Cold War thing!

2) The Feel-Good Finish

Like any good Christmas movie, Rocky IV has a suitably feel good finish, with good triumphing over evil. But Rocky doesn’t just defeat Drago and send him packing, he takes the opportunity, in his post-fight interview, to spread a message of peace.

He wants to bring the two warring nations together, despite suffering from severe concussion. “If I can change, and you can change, then everybody can change!” So true.

The 10 Best Sylvester Stallone Ultimate Action Movies!

1) That Post-Fight Feeling

You know that full-to-the-brim feeling you have inside your gut after a hefty Christmas dinner? That’s probably how Rocky felt, in part, after that fight with Drago.

Tired, full, but also feeling the Christmas spirit in his bones. All that, and he just brought an end to the Cold War. Your move, John McClane.


What are your thoughts on this ultimate action Christmas movie take? Let us know in the comments!

5 Ultimate Examples of Gary Busey Losing His Goddamn Mind

Gary Busey is the ultimate wild man of action movies. Here are 5 times the Busey absolutely lost it!

Gary Busey is an ultimate action movie treasure. Even in his early days, we’ve loved his cock-toothed grin and mad dog haircuts. His movie star voice howls out of the screen like a mix between Buddy Holly and a wild animal caught in a bear trap.

Today, we here at the Ultimate Action Movie Club are going to celebrate all the times in which Gary Busey has made our lives just a little bit better with his insane performances. From dressing up in drag and singing his heart out to breaking our hearts with his story of poor Prince Henry Stout, we love us some Gary Busey insanity.

Here are the five times in which Gary Busey absolutely lost his s*** in some of our favorite ultimate action movie moments!

Drag Dance Scene | Under Siege (1992)

If, for whatever reason you’ve been living an ultimate action movie sized rock and have no idea who Sir Gary Busey is, this might be the best way to meet the man, the myth, the legend! Steven Seagal’s Under Siege is an ultimate action movie classic for many reasons, but perhaps the greatest one is a truly odd, bizarre, over-the-top and awesome performance by the great Gary Busey.

Yes, he’s a ranking officer on a boat full of sailors. And yes they might be modestly excited (by U.S. Navy standards, certainly) for some music and live entertainment, Busey’s Commander Krill still thinks its a good and appropriate idea to dress up like a woman and parade himself around like a mad man.

Tommy Lee Jones seems to dig it, but he’s also about to kill everyone, so maybe he’s just using Busey’s dancing as motivation.

Read more about Busey’s performance in our case for UNDER SIEGE BEING SEAGAL’S GREATEST ACTION MOVIE!

2 Meatball Sandwiches | Point Break (1991)

To be honest, could do a whole article on this scene alone. Not to mention on the great Gary Busey and Keanu Reeves buddy comedy Point Break – (AND YEAH! I know Patrick Swayze is in it too, but this movie is about Busey and Reeves!)

So, let’s dive into this step-by-step. First, it’s 10:30 in the morning, the guys are on a stake-out and Busey is having the time of his life. Not only is he audibly guffawing away at a Calvin and Hobbes comic in the paper, he’s absolutely mad for some meatball sandwiches. Like there’s nothing else in the man’s head until the most remote of stimuli enters it. And the meatball sandwiches, he doesn’t order one for himself and ask what his blue-flame rookie wants? NO! He orders two for himself, sends the rook on the way then dives back into his Sunday funnies. Pure. Busey. Awesome. Insanity!

Sir Henry Stout Speech | Surviving the Game (1994)

While these other examples of the Busey monster being everyone’s fun-loving insane uncle, this scene from Surviving the Game is anything but. In his famous “Prince Henry Stout” monologue, Busey shows the sheer range of his insanity by describing, in detail, how his father forced him to kill his favorite dog.

While this fits well with the “man is the most dangerous game” motif of the film, there’s just something about this scene that is utterly insane.

Could it be that Busey isn’t acting at all? It really feels like he’s just telling a story from his youth. It would explain a lot.

Read more here about how MAN IS THE BEST PREY IN SURVIVING THE GAME (1994)

Do you Smoke Scene | Lethal Weapon (1987)

In a role that made Gary Busey a UAMC legend, Busey’s Mr. Joshua is a great example of how Busey can steal any scene he’s in. Specifically the “Do you smoke” scene where Busey – in a rare calm and collected performance – showcases just how unnerving the man can be.

Note the curled lip and deadly stare. That’s the face of a mad man who feels no pain. Fun fact: no special effects or prosthetics were used in this scene as Busey insisted on doing the stunt the same way he often does at his favorite beachside bar before ordering Jager shots for the rest of marina.

A F****** Alien Scene | Predator 2 (1990)

More proof that Busey, when he wants to, can clean up quite nicely. All told, his performance in Predator 2 is really quite admirable (and despite being overshadowed by the original Predator, is very much UAMC-worthy in of itself). However, even in his put-together performances, Busey still simmers with hot, steaming madness underneath.

With his “a f******* alien” delivery, you can see the clouds divide as you get a glimpse into the pure craziness which would go on to spawn I’m With Busey and a whole career worth of defying what people can understand as normal and rational thought and behavior.

We at the UAMC truly do salute and honor the great Gary Busey for his insane mad-cap action movie performances as one of the great insane actors of our generations!


What’s your favorite Gary Busey action movie moments? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

Exploring the Complicated Legacy of Robocop 2 (1990)

Robocop 2’s legacy lives on, but how do we reconcile with this ultimate sequel?

While the original Robocop remains a beloved classic, Robocop 2 has a more complicated legacy. Is it an underrated gem wrongly slandered by Paul Verhoeven fanboys? Is it a wretched stain upon action movie history only defended by the nostalgic?

I would go to neither extreme. Robocop 2 has exhilarating action and the magnificent Peter Weller, though it does lack other key elements which made the first a masterpiece.

The Universal Appeal of the Sci-Fi Action Classic Robocop (1987)

Peter Weller’s Robocop Returns!

Future Detroit is worse than ever: not only has the city gone bankrupt, forcing it ever more beneath the thumb of Omni Consumer Products, but crime permeates every level of society. Hot new designer drug Nuke is handed out like candy both on the street and within the police department, and little league teams commit armed robbery in broad daylight.

Naturally, Alex Murphy/Robocop (Peter Weller) has his hands full. His current mission is to hunt down Nuke dealer and cult leader Cain (Tom Noonan), as well as take down Hob (Gabriel Damon), Cain’s destructive tween henchman who uses Robocop’s inability to kill minors to his advantage. However, Murphy is still adjusting to life as a cyborg, especially since many of his OCP superiors still view him as nothing more than a product.

Meanwhile, OCP also wants to create a Robocop 2 since Murphy has been a big success, but nothing works out. However, when Cain proves himself a decent candidate for the program, things go awry, complicating Murphy’s life all the more.

The Most Villainous Bad Guys in Ultimate Action Movie History

How Does Robocop 2 Stack Up to the Original?

I don’t agree with every criticism leveled against Robocop 2. For instance, some claim Cain is a lackluster villain. True, he isn’t as fun as Clarence Bodicker or Dick Jones (one of UAMC’s greatest action movie villains of all time), but his Charles Manson vibe makes him a creepy adversary. When he becomes Robocop 2, he also gives Murphy one of the best battles in the trilogy, so he has that going for him too.

The character Hob usually comes under fire as well. People either find this swearing, violent kid hilarious or in horrible taste. Critic Roger Ebert was particularly disturbed, even going as far as to suggest sinister intentions on the part of the filmmakers. Ebert claimed Hob was meant to appeal to kids watching the movie despite its R-rating (after all, there was a Robocop cartoon on television) and therefore the irresponsible filmmakers were giving them a bad role model. Publications like the Christian Science Monitor echoed his perspective, calling the film “insidious.”

With all due respect, I find this reaction unwarranted and not just because wanting filmmakers to change their R-rated product on account of kids breaking rules to see it is unreasonable. From the amount of kid characters in the movie, particularly kids of criminals (think of the junkie feeding her baby in the opening scenes), one can surmise the filmmakers were likely trying to show how innocence is inevitably corrupted by such a twisted society.

Hob’s swearing like a Tarantino character might be comedic, but the film occasionally suggests he might have had no choice in how he turned out. The infamous moment where a wayward cop is vivisected by Cain’s thugs is telling: Cain forces this suddenly not-so-tough boy to watch the carnage despite his horror. The scene isn’t played for laughs—it’s gross, scary, and heartbreaking, with more than a few shades of Murphy’s murder in the original.

However, Hob’s sudden take-over of Cain’s operations is rather incredulous, even for something as overblown as Robocop, and his development after the vivisection scene is spotty. He seems to become even more of a homicidal monster, only to be played for pathos in the end—a pathos that, because it isn’t properly built up to, doesn’t pay off like it should. For this reviewer, that is a bigger issue than Hob being a violent child in and of itself. I imagine his development might be another casualty of the movie’s famously troubled production history.

Robocop (2014): The PG-13 Robocop Remake No One Wanted

Robocop 2’s Cultural Commentary

Unfortunately, the film is not as thorough with exploring its themes, coming off like a confused mess of plot threads. The film teases the audience by making us believe Murphy’s wife will try to reconnect with him, which would have been a great route to explore, showing how Murphy still has limitations due to his cybernetic existence (romantic/physical desire). But this thread is dropped as soon as it is introduced, never to be alluded to again.

Robocop 2 also swipes at PC culture when Robocop is given hundreds of useless directives to make him a better “role model” for children (one wonders if the filmmakers anticipated complaints in advance). He becomes useless as a crime fighter, instead lecturing delinquents on nutrition. But like the wife subplot, this development doesn’t last long, as Robocop fixes the problem within minutes. So much for conflict and suspense…

As a result, the story is choppy, like a series of half-baked television episodes strung together to make a feature. The pacing drags hard because there is no sense of simmering conflict with all of these mishandled characters and subplots. If better fleshed-out, Robocop 2 could have been a worthy successor to the original. As it is, it’s just a thematic sampler platter, unwilling to commit to anything in detail.

All of the Robocop Movies Ranked From Best to Worst

But How Ultimate is the Action?!

At the very least, the action is still well-done. Though accused of mean-spiritedness, the ultra-violence is outrageous in the manner of the first, if not always as imaginatively staged. The car chase between Murphy and Cain is a lot of fun. And the final fight between Robocop and Robocop 2 is a tour-de-force of stop-motion, and a worthy successor to the Murphy-Bodicker showdown in the first movie.

Robocop 2’s box office did not match the high numbers of the original; however, more than a few Robocop fans have fond memories of it and I can see why. Flawed as it may be, there are still many things to appreciate and fans will want to see it at least once, if only for the awesome action and Weller.

If only the same could be said of Robocop 3


What are your thoughts on Robocop 2 and how it stacks up to the original? Let us know in the comments or on our Facebook page!

5 Reasons ‘Die Hard’ is Absolutely a Christmas Movie (Plus 50 Catalogued Examples!)

Why Die Hard is not only a Christmas movie, but the MOST ULTIMATE Christmas movie of all time!

It’s that time of year again. We’ve all seen enough turkey to last us until next year, spent too much money on Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals, and wondered where the year has gone. With another year almost in the books, there’s only one more holiday to celebrate before the new year arrives. With Christmas upon us, a seemingly new tradition has emerged in recent years. 

Anyone not living under rock the past 30 years is familiar with the action-packed Die Hard franchise and its driving force, Det. John McClane; a New York City cop who has the worst luck being in the wrong place at the right time. Time and time again he stumbles upon (or is forced into) situations in which he must outwit and outgun his well-armed adversaries, often in the most explosive ways possible. Die Hard is the franchise that transformed Bruce Willis into an instant action star and cemented his place among the Big 3 of Hollywood action heavyweights; thanks, in large part, to its first entry.

But I’m not here to revel in the things we all know and agree on. I’m here to discuss something much more divisive. While it probably isn’t the most important topic of discussion, it certainly is the most fun debate I partake in this time of year: “Is Die Hard a Christmas movie?” The short answer is yes. Here are 5 reasons why Die Hard is not only a Christmas movie but the Ultimate Christmas movie.

READ MORE: BRUCE WILLIS IS BACK FOR ‘DIE HARD’ PREQUEL – ‘MCCLANE’

“It Isn’t About Christmas”

This is the number one argument I hear against Die Hard being a Christmas movie: “Just because it happens at Christmas time, doesn’t mean it’s ABOUT Christmas.” Actually, that’s exactly what it means. While the plot isn’t directly about celebrating Christmas, no one can deny the presence of the holiday. Anyone who says Die Hard isn’t a Christmas movie because it isn’t about the holiday must say the same about the Halloween franchise because it’s technically about Michael Myers, not the holiday. Yeah, good luck with that.

READ MORE: THE BEST ACTION MOVIES TO WATCH DURING THE HOLIDAYS

Family at Its Core

I would venture to say that most people’s ideal Christmas revolves around family (regardless of how dysfunctional). Love ‘em or hate ‘em, they are still family. Die Hard is no different. At its core, the film is about reconciliation. The entire premise revolves around John coming to Los Angeles in hopes of patching things up with his wife, Holly, and spending Christmas together with their kids as a family. We can all relate to that.

READ MORE: RANKING THE DIE HARD MOVIES FROM WORST TO BEST

“But It’s an Action Movie”

 

Since when have Christmas movies been declared Hallmark Channel exclusives? Having a plethora of guns, explosions, and coarse language doesn’t make it any less about Christmas. It’s just a Christmas movie of the male persuasion. 

PSA: This, in no way, means that people who “identify” as women can’t like Christmas movies with guns, explosions, and coarse language. I’m just saying that the Hallmark Channel doesn’t air them, unfortunately. Maybe the Hallmark Channel should be more gender neutral…

P.S. If that subtle jab offended you, maybe you should identify as a man and stop watching the Hallmark Channel.

P.S.S. I’m just kidding, Hallmark. I don’t hate you. It’s Lifetime I hate.

READ MORE: THE MOST VILLAINOUS BAD GUYS IN ULTIMATE ACTION MOVIE HISTORY (guess who is #1!)

It’s a Feel-Good Flick

Why do we enjoy watching Christmas movies? The answer is because they make us feel good. Often, they start at a place of pure bliss and stay there throughout. Other times the journey is more… eventful. But the destination is always the same. Who (except Ellis; RIP) doesn’t want to see John and Holly end up back together at the end of Die Hard? Don’t forget about Sgt. Powell’s overlooked roller coaster of a career from normal street cop to accidental kid killer to troubled desk jockey to Johnny got his gun back. Maybe this should be on the Hallmark Channel…

READ MORE: DIE HARD’S REGINALD VELJOHNSON ISN’T RULING OUT A RETURN FOR SERGEANT AL POWELL

“It’s Christmas, It’s Christmas, Christmas Everywhere”

From the sleigh bells ringing in the opening sequence, to the Christmas party, to the soundtrack, to the dialogue, the film is littered with Christmas themes and references. There is a total of 51 Christmas references in the film; 16 in the first FIVE MINUTES! (yes, I counted). Here, is the full list. If this number alone doesn’t settle this debate, then you are simply being a Scrooge. 

NOTE: I meticulously documented every Christmas reference found in the film, but I’m not “God’s greatest gift” so I could’ve missed some. See what I did there? A Christmas reference and a Die Hard reference in an article about Die Hard being a Christmas movie. Try hard? Oh, forget it. Yippee-Ki-Yay, motherf***er!


This badass article was written by Derek Kennamer – a cinematic fanatic and the coolest rockstar in his own fantasy world whose favorite superpower is quoting movies in everyday life.

Let us know what you think in the comments or on our Facebook page!